hheik
/
xv6-riscv-rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Gcc expects to be able to pick up the return 

address off the stack, so put one there for it.
(Bug was hidden by bad segment limits.)
feat/start
rsc 2007-08-14 04:56:30 +00:00
parent 2ef3a64bb4
commit 8c4b5fc5b3
1 changed files with 11 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

15
main.c
View File

@ -128,12 +128,12 @@ process0(void)
p0->cwd = iget(rootdev, 1);
iunlock(p0->cwd);
// dummy user memory to make copyproc() happy.
// must be big enough to hold the init binary.
p0->sz = PAGE;
// Dummy user memory to make copyproc() happy.
// Must be big enough to hold the init binary and stack.
p0->sz = 2*PAGE;
p0->mem = kalloc(p0->sz);
// fake a trap frame as if a user process had made a system
// Fake a trap frame as if a user process had made a system
// call, so that copyproc will have a place for the new
// process to return to.
p0->tf = &tf;
@ -142,6 +142,13 @@ process0(void)
p0->tf->cs = (SEG_UCODE << 3) | DPL_USER;
p0->tf->eflags = FL_IF;
p0->tf->esp = p0->sz;
// Push bogus return address, both to cause problems
// if main returns and also because gcc can generate
// function prologs that expect to be able to read the
// return address off the stack without causing a fault.
p0->tf->esp -= 4;
*(uint*)(p0->mem + p0->tf->esp) = 0xefefefef;
p1 = copyproc(p0);